
We are entering the 2026 budget season. Last year, our CFO-CMO event revealed a unanimous finding: most tensions stem from poor preparation for these conversations.
'Give me money' vs 'No, I won't.' This parent-child dynamic poisons many tech companies. The problem isn't money — it's the nature of the discussion.
When a CMO walks in asking for €50K for an event with no context, she puts the CFO in an uncomfortable position: how do you arbitrate on a domain you don't fully understand?
The solution: Establish clear contracting from the outset. Who approves what? How does a spend get committed? How is the budget tracked? These clear rules prevent situations where overspend is only discovered after the fact.

.avif)
The CFO-CMO relationship works when it moves beyond the requester-arbitrator dynamic and becomes a genuine partnership. The ingredients for success:
Ultimately, CFOs and CMOs share the same objective: deploying the company's capital optimally to ensure its growth and sustainability. This alignment of interests can transform a conflictual relationship into a competitive advantage.
Rather than arriving with a one-off request, the CMO should first:
This approach reassures the CFO: they're not dealing with someone who 'just does stuff', but with a professional who has a considered vision.
CFOs want explanation, not persuasion. They don't know marketing, but they master capital deployment. Their role is to ensure that the company's money generates the best possible ROI.
This relationship works both ways. Marketers must also educate their CFOs on the specificities of marketing — particularly the difficulty of measuring everything, especially brand.
A crucial point: CFOs change domain of expertise with every company. In HR, commercial, or ops roles, they adapt quickly. Marketing remains the only department where they sometimes take 6 months to understand the mechanics.
CFOs are analytical thinkers who quickly detect a sales posture. They prefer a cold, data-driven approach:
This transparency on performance builds trust and strengthens the relationship.
Contrary to popular belief, the CFO must be the guardian of the long game, not the quarterly target. When we talk about capital (rather than expenses), we're talking about ROI over several years.
Marketers should challenge CFOs who think too short-term and use the fear argument: show concrete examples of companies that failed through under-investment in brand.
To avoid endless back-and-forth during the budget process:
This pragmatic method reduces uncertainty and facilitates discussions.
To avoid monthly reforecasts that exhaust everyone:
Les CFO attendent des CMO qu’ils parlent le même langage financier qu’eux, qu’ils puissent démontrer clairement la contribution du marketing à la croissance et au résultat, et qu’ils présentent leurs initiatives en termes de ROI et de performance mesurable plutôt que de simples activités marketing.
La relation est parfois difficile parce que les responsables marketing et financiers n’utilisent pas les mêmes indicateurs ou ne les interprètent pas de la même façon. Les CFO se focalisent sur l’impact financier des investissements, tandis que les CMO parlent souvent de portée ou d’engagement. Sans un langage commun centré sur la valeur business et les KPIs financiers pertinents, il est compliqué de collaborer efficacement.
Oui. Une majorité de CFO reconnaissent que le marketing est essentiel à la croissance, mais ils veulent avant tout voir des preuves concrètes de sa performance, comme des métriques financières liées à la génération de revenus, la réduction des coûts d’acquisition ou l’optimisation des investissements.
Pour répondre aux attentes des CFO, un CMO doit aligner ses objectifs avec les priorités financières de l’entreprise, mesurer l’impact de ses actions en termes de revenus et de rentabilité, et être capable de quantifier ses résultats avec des KPIs compréhensibles par la finance, tout en expliquant comment ces chiffres se traduisent en valeur business.