
We are entering the 2026 budget season. Last year, our CFO-CMO event revealed a unanimous finding: most tensions stem from poor preparation for these conversations.
'Give me money' vs 'No, I won't.' This parent-child dynamic poisons many tech companies. The problem isn't money — it's the nature of the discussion.
When a CMO walks in asking for €50K for an event with no context, she puts the CFO in an uncomfortable position: how do you arbitrate on a domain you don't fully understand?
The solution: Establish clear contracting from the outset. Who approves what? How does a spend get committed? How is the budget tracked? These clear rules prevent situations where overspend is only discovered after the fact.

.avif)
The CFO-CMO relationship works when it moves beyond the requester-arbitrator dynamic and becomes a genuine partnership. The ingredients for success:
Ultimately, CFOs and CMOs share the same objective: deploying the company's capital optimally to ensure its growth and sustainability. This alignment of interests can transform a conflictual relationship into a competitive advantage.
Rather than arriving with a one-off request, the CMO should first:
This approach reassures the CFO: they're not dealing with someone who 'just does stuff', but with a professional who has a considered vision.
CFOs want explanation, not persuasion. They don't know marketing, but they master capital deployment. Their role is to ensure that the company's money generates the best possible ROI.
This relationship works both ways. Marketers must also educate their CFOs on the specificities of marketing — particularly the difficulty of measuring everything, especially brand.
A crucial point: CFOs change domain of expertise with every company. In HR, commercial, or ops roles, they adapt quickly. Marketing remains the only department where they sometimes take 6 months to understand the mechanics.
CFOs are analytical thinkers who quickly detect a sales posture. They prefer a cold, data-driven approach:
This transparency on performance builds trust and strengthens the relationship.
Contrary to popular belief, the CFO must be the guardian of the long game, not the quarterly target. When we talk about capital (rather than expenses), we're talking about ROI over several years.
Marketers should challenge CFOs who think too short-term and use the fear argument: show concrete examples of companies that failed through under-investment in brand.
To avoid endless back-and-forth during the budget process:
This pragmatic method reduces uncertainty and facilitates discussions.
To avoid monthly reforecasts that exhaust everyone:
CFOs expect CMOs to speak the same financial language they do, to be able to clearly demonstrate marketing's contribution to growth and to the bottom line, and to present their initiatives in terms of ROI and measurable performance rather than mere marketing activities.
The relationship is sometimes difficult because marketing and finance leaders don't use the same indicators or don't interpret them the same way. CFOs focus on the financial impact of investments, while CMOs often talk about reach or engagement. Without a common language centered on business value and relevant financial KPIs, it's hard to collaborate effectively.
Yes. A majority of CFOs recognize that marketing is essential to growth, but above all they want to see concrete proof of its performance, such as financial metrics tied to revenue generation, reduced acquisition costs, or optimized investments.
To meet CFOs' expectations, a CMO must align their objectives with the company's financial priorities, measure the impact of their actions in terms of revenue and profitability, and be able to quantify their results with KPIs that finance can understand, while explaining how those figures translate into business value.