Apollo blocks calls to Do Not Call-listed numbers once screening is switched on, an opt-in setting, but its own contract still pushes TCPA and CAN-SPAM compliance onto the customer, and its email opt-out link is optional, can be toggled off, and expires after 47 days; Reply.io names no TCPA or calling provision at all, though it requires A2P 10DLC registration for SMS and honors STOP replies. Scope compared, criterion by criterion. Checked 7 September 2026.





Apollo blocks calls to numbers on the Do Not Call registry once screening is switched on — an opt-in setting, not a default — while its own contract still places TCPA and CAN-SPAM compliance onto the customer regardless. Its email opt-out link is optional, can be toggled off by the sender, and expires after forty-seven days; no SMS step exists in the product at all.
Reply.io ships an opt-out link by default on email, though the customer can remove it, and no non-compliant send is technically blocked; TCPA and calling are absent from what it publishes entirely. Its SMS channel requires A2P 10DLC registration and honors STOP requests, but the send window itself is set by the user, not enforced by the platform.
Reply, incorporated as ReplyApp Inc. under Delaware law, runs on Azure, geo-replicated across two data centers with no US region named, and publishes no SOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, StateRAMP, GovCloud, or HIPAA business associate agreement. Apollo hosts in the US without naming a region either, claiming ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 Type II, and CASA Tier 2 for itself, though the same four regulated-cloud items are just as absent from its pages.
Reply’s own terms place all taxes on the customer, excluding only Reply’s own income tax, with withholding likewise the customer’s burden via certificate; no tax page, state list, or local calculation is published. Apollo’s terms, at section 4(c)(iv), do the same, excepting only taxes on Apollo’s own net income, with no tax policy page or state list either.
Apollo’s opt-in call-blocking is a real technical control, but its contract still assigns the legal duty elsewhere — a split this piece does not resolve into one verdict. Reply.io skips the calling question altogether while treating its SMS channel more strictly, with registration required and STOP honored, even though the hour at which a message goes out is left entirely to whoever configured the campaign.
Can't find what you're looking for ? Contact us here
jordan@bulldozer-collective.comGet access to playbooks and feedback from those who are shaping the next wave of marketing and AI.